GUEST POST: Too little knowledge can be a dangerous thing

5 July 2009


By Wendy Fraser (aka PJ)

Recent coverage of events such as those surrounding the death of Michael Jackson and the scandals associated with MP’s expenses have one stark similarity - the depth to which detail is reported, analysed and interpreted. Of course there is huge diversity in the opinions presented depending upon which newspaper, internet site or blog that you choose to read but by virtue of the sheer volume of detail we do all become armchair experts in these debates. What then of the debate surrounding wearing of the burkha or the veil in the UK? I’d hazard a guess that most people have an opinion on the subject, and some of them have certainly been strongly aired in the media recently, yet it strikes me that although this issue is reported with recurring frequency what is lacking so far is enough detail for an informed debate.

In order for that debate to have any possibility of reaching a positive conclusion there are currently several key missing elements, starting with a lack of clarity and depth of understanding of the issues. There are many separate, although admittedly related, aspects that merit examination and discussion; national and personal security, the oppression of women (or not), cultural and religious differences to name but a few. To my mind the starting point has to be that of security concerns relating to identities being “hidden” by the veil. To wade into a debate about the misinterpretation of the Koran to oppress women from certain cultures is unlikely to lead to a successful outcome unless it is approached with extreme caution and considerable knowledge, indeed it may only serve to drive a wedge between Muslim and non-Muslim communities and add strength to the loathsome BNP. Lord only knows we must avoid that at all costs!

As a Western society that all too often takes our freedoms for granted it is hard to imagine the realities of living hidden from view and subject to restrictions that to us appear alien and oppressive. Having lived for some time in Saudi Arabia I have experienced what it is like to live in a country where the majority of women are veiled and shrouded in black abbiyahs. Although there was no law stating that Western women were obliged to wear an abbiyah we were strongly advised by the British Embassy to do so, after all we were visitors to another culture and should be respectful of their customs and social expectations. Clearly it doesn’t always work both ways...but that is another topic for another day. Women were segregated from men almost everywhere; the mosques, hospitals, restaurants, transport and (of particular relevance to this discussion) airports. At each airport there was a separate area designed specifically to counter the difficulties of searching women. Here veils, abbiyahs, burkhas etc were all removed and female searchers carried out the security checks as normal.

Given that some of our specific security concerns about identities hidden behind burkhas and veils are an integral part of the security procedures of many countries I can only hope that we are looking at those examples for potential solutions. And particularly asking the communities within the UK that these issues affect to be an active part in helping develop a better understanding of the problems and find a mutually acceptable solution.

My children cried when I first put on my abbiyah, they cried because they were scared of what would happen to me because they saw how differently women were treated and didn’t want that to happen to me. But very quickly they realised that the clothing didn’t change me (I was still the same Mummy) and I actually learned to enjoy wearing it when it was 50C and I could walk through the city wearing my abbiyah and be considerably more cool and comfortable than in western clothes. Their perception changed with understanding, as did mine.

We are afraid of what we do not understand, we react defensively and often aggressively to what we believe may be a threat to us or others around us. But we mustn’t forget to do the education necessary to fully understand the problem, from both sides. Without that knowledge we have little hope of finding a solution.

4 comments:

Caron said...

Really interesting post. I particularly like the last paragraph about being open minded enough to learn and understand. If we hope to bring people together there has to be a mutual desire to get where the other is coming from.

I posted on the wearing of the veil last week because it annoyed me that a woman who wore it was treated really badly and rudely. I didn't agree with a lot of what she was saying, but that's not the point.

Thanks for this insight.

Yousuf Hamid said...

This is a valid contribution to the ongoing debate on multiculturalism and integration.

Wendy is absolutely right to say that entering a wide theological debate into the merits of a veil can lead to a dark place unless you happen to be an Islamic scholar.

It never ceases to astound me the number of ignorant people who believe that by quoting the Koran they understand it and can somehow pass judgement on it to make crass generalisations on a billion people across earth.

Rather than doing this Wendy gives a genuine insight with personal experiences; a very valuable input.

Holyrood Patter said...

what depresses me sometimes is the ignorance of people discussing this item of clothing without seeming to accept that many millions of women were it through choice.
to think that these women do it simply due to meek submission as is big an insult to them as the perceivied indignity of wearing the veil in the first instance

Caitriona said...

Whether women do it through choice or not does not mean that it should be accepted. Many women would 'choose' to defer to their husbands, or 'choose' not to work. Anyway the idea of individual choice, freed from social context, is deeply suspect.

Similarly, the question of Koranic interpretation is irrelevant unless we accept theological input in state decision making. And, particularly in Scotland, we don't.

Setting up separate female security checkpoints in airports is one thing, how about the separate female university faculties and all the rest of the infrastructure? The question is: do we want segregation based on gender in our societies or not? Not everyone will be happy with the answer.

The Old Stuff

THE GREEN BOX

Polly Toynbee | guardian.co.uk

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP